Town to Revamp Tree Code

Worried residents told tree ordinance will be replaced, not abolished.

officials said they intend to continue protecting the town's trademark trees after residents voiced concern over a code change. An announcement that the town's tree ordinance was being repealed caused several residents to plead for its reinstatement.

The town's tree codes require a permit before a property owner can remove a tree. The strictness of the code was partially inspired by an incident in 1973 involving a Woodbury man who demolished 15 acres of trees on his property. The loss devastated environmental supporters, who went into overdrive to protect TOBAY's environment by supporting the tree ordinance. When the Town of Oyster Bay website announced the apparent repeal of the ordinance, environmentalists around TOBAY were shocked.

"The thought of eliminating a tree ordinance in the Town of Oyster Bay flies in the face of my mind of reasoning out of environmental concern," said . "Don't leave it open for another developer who decides he doesn't like what you've done and you wake up the next morning to see total destruction."

Town Supervisor John Venditto corrected the notion that repealing the tree ordinance meant it would be totally abolished.

"I have no personal problem with the tree ordinance. I don't think it's unreasonable," said Venditto, adding it was an important tool in preventing the "wholesale ravaging" of TOBAY's trademark trees. A repeal, he said, would simply make way for an improved code.

The two driving forces behind revamping the code, according to Venditto, are concerns of government intrusion and economic burden.

"The $75 to take down a tree is starting to mean a lot more these days," he said of the tree removal fee. The Town's ordering a property owner to remove a tree makes the government too involved, he added, saying residents may think, "Who the heck are you to come into my backyard and take down a tree?"

Venditto clarified that the extended hearings on the matter, which continue through the Sept. 4 board meeting, will bring as much discussion and feedback as possible so the ordinance has the perfect language.

"We need a compromise between trees and people," said resident Donald Zeller, referencing a neighbor who was denied a permit to remove a tree that just weeks later, crashed into his house and caused extensive damage.

"I wish I could tell you the words for it, but I think somehow or other, we need to say that we will protect the human beings where we have to and where we don't have to, we would protect the trees."

Venditto agreed, saying the language of the ordinance has been a major concern and is a large reason why the development of a new ordinance will be so in depth.

loisjean28 September 05, 2012 at 10:34 PM
I was not aware of this ordinance about tree removal. If TOB had an ordinance for the trees on the grass strip between between the side walk and the street curb, I would agree with the ordinance. I don't think it is right for the government to say you cannot take down a tree in your backyard and charge you for permission! The cost to take down a tree is expensive and time consuming to shop around for the cheapest price. Then you have to add a charge to give to the town. It is unfair we all are suffering finacially!


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »